Tim,
On 20 Jul 2017, at 14:09, tjw ietf wrote:
Another Data Point:
One of the Apps Area ADs stopped by to tell the chairs that 1) they
like
the general idea; 2) their employer has a need for this *outside of
the PTR
space*; and 3) would be willing to shepherd the work through. Now,
they
also the first to admit that the Application people do the most abuse
to
DNS standards (hence the need for the attrleaf document).
In fact, my employer, who is quite abusive in how they deploy CNAMEs
could
very easily work up a very legitimate use case for using BULK for
deploying
some of our larger zones. Add that to the fact that my employer
insists
on deploying DNS between multiple vendors - whether it is DNS software
or
managed DNS services.
It would be very helpful if the mentioned AD, or your employer, could
elaborate on these use cases. As it stands we (PowerDNS) do not see the
point of BULK (even though we are capable of online signing and thus
have it easier than some of the other name servers), but we could
certainly be convinced otherwise.
Kind regards,
--
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
