In article <4b2b2d27-7e24-41bc-93b7-d33faf783...@vpnc.org> you write: >If the WG still gets to freely edit the document while adhering to >"describes an existing and widely deployed method", this seems like a >good way forwards.
Text can change, bits can't. OK with me. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
