On 27 June 2017 at 18:10, Jan Včelák <j...@fcelda.cz> wrote: >8
There is plenty other alternative ways to express DS DELETE request. > But I would prefer accepting this simple erratum rather than > researching all the other options (which we should have done when > revising the drafts of this document). > There is no point in moaning that things could/should have been done better. What is needed now is methodical use-case analysis based on RFC8078 as it exists now and tested against a real implementation. The time to rewrite the RFC will come if/when we discover we are unable to live with it. We have not reached that point yet. --Dick
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
