On 30/03/2017 09:52, Bob Harold wrote: >> Just a thought - would it be better to have two different EDNS0 options >> that carry an IP, or to have one EDNS0 option that carries both an IP >> and a 'type', and allow multiples of that option in a packet?
Ray Bellis writes: > IMHO, two options is better. I'm with Ray on this, both because of his earlier observation re: TXT, and also because this complicates the option design and adds yet< another number registry. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
