> On Mar 28, 2017, at 12:31 PM, Peter van Dijk <peter.van.d...@powerdns.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Please note that neither draft handles the use case of also passing the port 
> number, which in a world of growing CGN deployment, may soon prove quite 
> important.

Can you elaborate?

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to