On 21.3.2017 13:23, Ralph Droms wrote: > Petr, thanks for your review and feedback... > >> On Mar 15, 2017, at 6:52 AM, Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> wrote: >> >> On 14.3.2017 12:28, Ralph Droms wrote: >>> draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 includes revised text to address issues raised >>> during the WG last call and other editorial improvements. The list of >>> issues, discussion and resolution are in GitHub: >>> https://github.com/Abhayakara/draft-tldr-sutld-ps >>> >>> There is one substantial addition to the list of problems in section 3: the >>> use of DNSSEC with Special-Use Domain Names. >> >> The 03 version is a very good one. >> >> I would like to comment on one side-effect of the changes: >> The Summary section was removed and the text moved elsewhere. IMHO this >> makes the document less understandable to a person who was not involved >> with its development. >> >> For this reason I propose new Summary section, which would be basically >> current 4.1.4. Liaison Statement on Technical Use of Domain Names. >> >> The reference to these two I-Ds can be at the same place as current 4.1.4. >> >> >> So the new text would look like: >> >> 4.1.4. Expired Internet Drafts Relating to SUDN >> /links to/ >> [I-D.chapin-additional-reserved-tlds] >> [I-D.grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names] >> >> 6. Summary >> As a result of processing requests to add names to the Special-Use >> Domain Name registry, as documented in >> [I-D.chapin-additional-reserved-tlds] and >> [I-D.grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names], the IAB initiated a review >> of the process defined in RFC 6761 for adding names to the registry. >> This review was identified as in the charter of the IETF DNSOP >> working group, and the review has been conducted in that working >> group. The Liaison Statement [SDO-IAB-ICANN-LS] notified ICANN of >> the review, affirmed that the discussion would be "open and >> transparent to participation by interested parties" and explicitly >> invited members of the ICANN community to participate. >> This document is a product of the IETF DNSOP working group review of >> the registry process in RFC 6761. >> >> >> I believe that original 4.1.4 nicely summarizes what this document is about. > > I agree that some of the text belongs in a more prominent place, to alert the > reader to the process behind the document. I've opened an issue: > draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03 > > Our proposed solution is to move some of the detail behind this document from > section 4.1.4 to the Introduction. > > OLD: > > 1. Introduction > > [...] > > Special-Use Domain Names [RFC6761] created an IANA registry for > Special-Use Domain Names [SDO-IANA-SUDR], defined policies for adding > to the registry, and made some suggestions about how those policies > might be implemented. Since the publication of RFC 6761, the IETF > has been asked to designate several new Special-Use Domain Names in > this registry. During the evaluation process for these Special-Use > Domain Names, the IETF encountered several different sorts of issues. > Because of this, the IETF has decided to investigate the problem and > decide if and how the RFC 6761 process can be improved, or whether it > should be deprecated. > > NEW: > > 1. Introduction > > [...] > > Special-Use Domain Names [RFC6761] created an IANA registry for > Special-Use Domain Names [SDO-IANA-SUDR], defined policies for adding > to the registry, and made some suggestions about how those policies > might be implemented. Since the publication of RFC 6761, the IETF > has been asked to designate several new Special-Use Domain Names in > this registry. During the evaluation process for these Special-Use > Domain Names, the IETF encountered several different sorts of issues. > Because of this, the IETF has decided to investigate the problem and > decide if and how the RFC 6761 process can be improved, or whether it > should be deprecated. The IETF DSNOP working group charter was > extended to include conducting a review of the process for adding > names to the registry that is defined in RFC 6761. This document is a > product of that review. > > OLD: > > 4.1.4. Liaison Statement on Technical Use of Domain Names > > As a result of processing requests to add names to the Special-Use > Domain Name registry, as documented in > [I-D.chapin-additional-reserved-tlds] and > [I-D.grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names], the IAB initiated a review > of the process defined in RFC 6761 for adding names to the registry. > This review was identified as in the charter of the IETF DNSOP > working group, and the review has been conducted in that working > group. The Liaison Statement [SDO-IAB-ICANN-LS] notified ICANN of > the review, affirmed that the discussion would be "open and > transparent to participation by interested parties" and explicitly > invited members of the ICANN community to participate. > > This document is a product of the IETF DNSOP working group review of > the registry process in RFC 6761. > > NEW: > > 4.1.4. Liaison Statement on Technical Use of Domain Names > > As a result of processing requests to add names to the Special-Use > Domain Name registry, as documented in > [I-D.chapin-additional-reserved-tlds] and > [I-D.grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names], a review was chartered > of the process defined in RFC 6761 for adding names to the registry > (as explained earlier). The Liaison Statement [SDO-IAB-ICANN-LS] > notified ICANN of the review, affirmed that the discussion would be > "open and transparent to participation by interested parties" and > explicitly invited members of the ICANN community to participate. > > - Ralph
Sounds good to me, thank you! Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC >>> In the authors' opinion, draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 addresses all of the >>> WG last call issues and the document is ready to be forwarded to the IESG. >>> >>> - Ralph >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 13, 2017, at 3:26 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>> directories. >>>> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. >>>> >>>> Title : Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement >>>> Authors : Ted Lemon >>>> Ralph Droms >>>> Warren Kumari >>>> Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03.txt >>>> Pages : 27 >>>> Date : 2017-03-13 >>>> >>>> Abstract: >>>> The Special-Use Domain Names IANA registry policy defined in RFC 6761 >>>> has been shown through experience to present unanticipated >>>> challenges. This memo presents a list, intended to be comprehensive, >>>> of the problems that have been identified. In addition it reviews >>>> the history of Domain Names and summarizes current IETF publications >>>> and some publications from other organizations relating to Special- >>>> Use Domain Names. >>>> >>>> >>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ >>>> >>>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 >>>> >>>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 >>>> >>>> >>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>> submission >>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>>> >>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ -- Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
