Petr, thanks for your review and feedback... > On Mar 15, 2017, at 6:52 AM, Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> wrote: > > On 14.3.2017 12:28, Ralph Droms wrote: >> draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 includes revised text to address issues raised >> during the WG last call and other editorial improvements. The list of >> issues, discussion and resolution are in GitHub: >> https://github.com/Abhayakara/draft-tldr-sutld-ps >> >> There is one substantial addition to the list of problems in section 3: the >> use of DNSSEC with Special-Use Domain Names. > > The 03 version is a very good one. > > I would like to comment on one side-effect of the changes: > The Summary section was removed and the text moved elsewhere. IMHO this > makes the document less understandable to a person who was not involved > with its development. > > For this reason I propose new Summary section, which would be basically > current 4.1.4. Liaison Statement on Technical Use of Domain Names. > > The reference to these two I-Ds can be at the same place as current 4.1.4. > > > So the new text would look like: > > 4.1.4. Expired Internet Drafts Relating to SUDN > /links to/ > [I-D.chapin-additional-reserved-tlds] > [I-D.grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names] > > 6. Summary > As a result of processing requests to add names to the Special-Use > Domain Name registry, as documented in > [I-D.chapin-additional-reserved-tlds] and > [I-D.grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names], the IAB initiated a review > of the process defined in RFC 6761 for adding names to the registry. > This review was identified as in the charter of the IETF DNSOP > working group, and the review has been conducted in that working > group. The Liaison Statement [SDO-IAB-ICANN-LS] notified ICANN of > the review, affirmed that the discussion would be "open and > transparent to participation by interested parties" and explicitly > invited members of the ICANN community to participate. > This document is a product of the IETF DNSOP working group review of > the registry process in RFC 6761. > > > I believe that original 4.1.4 nicely summarizes what this document is about.
I agree that some of the text belongs in a more prominent place, to alert the reader to the process behind the document. I've opened an issue: draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03 Our proposed solution is to move some of the detail behind this document from section 4.1.4 to the Introduction. OLD: 1. Introduction [...] Special-Use Domain Names [RFC6761] created an IANA registry for Special-Use Domain Names [SDO-IANA-SUDR], defined policies for adding to the registry, and made some suggestions about how those policies might be implemented. Since the publication of RFC 6761, the IETF has been asked to designate several new Special-Use Domain Names in this registry. During the evaluation process for these Special-Use Domain Names, the IETF encountered several different sorts of issues. Because of this, the IETF has decided to investigate the problem and decide if and how the RFC 6761 process can be improved, or whether it should be deprecated. NEW: 1. Introduction [...] Special-Use Domain Names [RFC6761] created an IANA registry for Special-Use Domain Names [SDO-IANA-SUDR], defined policies for adding to the registry, and made some suggestions about how those policies might be implemented. Since the publication of RFC 6761, the IETF has been asked to designate several new Special-Use Domain Names in this registry. During the evaluation process for these Special-Use Domain Names, the IETF encountered several different sorts of issues. Because of this, the IETF has decided to investigate the problem and decide if and how the RFC 6761 process can be improved, or whether it should be deprecated. The IETF DSNOP working group charter was extended to include conducting a review of the process for adding names to the registry that is defined in RFC 6761. This document is a product of that review. OLD: 4.1.4. Liaison Statement on Technical Use of Domain Names As a result of processing requests to add names to the Special-Use Domain Name registry, as documented in [I-D.chapin-additional-reserved-tlds] and [I-D.grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names], the IAB initiated a review of the process defined in RFC 6761 for adding names to the registry. This review was identified as in the charter of the IETF DNSOP working group, and the review has been conducted in that working group. The Liaison Statement [SDO-IAB-ICANN-LS] notified ICANN of the review, affirmed that the discussion would be "open and transparent to participation by interested parties" and explicitly invited members of the ICANN community to participate. This document is a product of the IETF DNSOP working group review of the registry process in RFC 6761. NEW: 4.1.4. Liaison Statement on Technical Use of Domain Names As a result of processing requests to add names to the Special-Use Domain Name registry, as documented in [I-D.chapin-additional-reserved-tlds] and [I-D.grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names], a review was chartered of the process defined in RFC 6761 for adding names to the registry (as explained earlier). The Liaison Statement [SDO-IAB-ICANN-LS] notified ICANN of the review, affirmed that the discussion would be "open and transparent to participation by interested parties" and explicitly invited members of the ICANN community to participate. - Ralph > > Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC > > >> >> In the authors' opinion, draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 addresses all of the >> WG last call issues and the document is ready to be forwarded to the IESG. >> >> - Ralph >> >> >>> On Mar 13, 2017, at 3:26 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>> directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement >>> Authors : Ted Lemon >>> Ralph Droms >>> Warren Kumari >>> Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03.txt >>> Pages : 27 >>> Date : 2017-03-13 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> The Special-Use Domain Names IANA registry policy defined in RFC 6761 >>> has been shown through experience to present unanticipated >>> challenges. This memo presents a list, intended to be comprehensive, >>> of the problems that have been identified. In addition it reviews >>> the history of Domain Names and summarizes current IETF publications >>> and some publications from other organizations relating to Special- >>> Use Domain Names. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ >>> >>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
