> On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> No snark intended, but if "the protocol" were really just DNS, we wouldn't >> be having this discussion. Rather, it is the DNS wire protocol using a >> local resolution context rather than the root zone. In any event, yes, the >> locally server homenet zone can function with DNSSEC. > > So do locally-served zones, by this definition, use a different protocol?
As Matt Larson just pointed out, "different protocol" may turn into a distraction. .homenet is asking for an entry in the special-use domain name registry and a specific kind of entry in the DNS root zone. I take those characteristics to differentiate homenet, perhaps as an extension or variant of DNS. - Ralph > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
