On Mar 23, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I meant the question to cover both cases. The second question may well be > more important in the “never available” case, but that’s part of what I’m > trying to understand.
I think in the "never available" case we would obsolete the allocation and choose home.arpa instead. That would be a bad outcome; if we really think there is no chance of this allocation happening, we shouldn't go down this path. But I persist in claiming that we need to go down this path one way or the other to get clarity on where we stand with technical uses under the MoU. We should have done this back in 2000, but better 17 years late than never. Do please note that what we have proposed does not cause DNSSEC validation to work: rather, absent a pre-configured trust anchor, it causes it to be skipped.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
