I have a big problem with Section 6 of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03. If the domain name is to be published in the root zone, then I do not think that the special-use TLD registration is appropriate. That said, if the requirement for publication in the root zone is removed, I do not have a problem with proceeding with a special-use TLD registration.
Russ > On Mar 19, 2017, at 9:44 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > The INT Area Director who oversees the homenet WG, Terry Manderson, has asked > DNSOP participants to review > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03.txt > <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03.txt>, "Special Use Top > Level Domain '.homenet’”, with the following aspects in mind: > > 1) in terms of RFC6761 > > 2) in terms of the _operational_ position of an unsigned entry in the root > zone as requested in this document, to break the chain of trust for local DNS > resolution of .homenet names. > > This document is the product of the homenet WG, which has asked the IESG to > approve it for publication, so our comments are strictly advisory to the > IESG. There was some discussion of the draft on this list shortly after it > appeared, in November 2016, but it’s always the AD’s prerogative to ask for > additional review. > > > > thanks, > Suzanne & Tim
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
