Hi, On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 10:35:19PM -0700, william manning wrote: > Joel, > > I'd be happy to see the document proceed under two conditions: 1) it > becomes a WG document, subject to IETF change control
Without my IAB hat on, I should think that is self-evident. If a WG adopts a document, it's a WG product and the WG (and thereby IETF) gets change control of the document. This is why the WG editors (called "authors") of the document can be replaced at the pleasure of the WG chairs. > enclave that is NOT part of the open Internet. Adoption and acceptance of > this draft is an acknowledgement that the IETF, the IAB and ISOC reject the With my IAB hat on, this WG is not in a position to make any claims about what the IAB does or does not reject. IAB positions are not subject to IETF consensus; the IETF is able to remove IAB members if it wishes using the recall procedures, but it cannot decide what the IAB is or is not going to say. (I suspect the IETF is not in a position to make claims about ISOC's views, either, but I will allow ISOC to speak for itself.) Therefore, even if I supported the disclaimer, which I do not, the WG could not add it to the document. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
