On 13/03/2017 05:35, william manning wrote: > Joel, > > I'd be happy to see the document proceed under two conditions: 1) it > becomes a WG document, subject to IETF change control, and 2) that the > disclaimer requested back on 20170103 be added to the document. To > refresh the collective mind, here is the missing text: > > applicability statement. > > This draft is documents a process and method for intercepting DNS > queries and fabricating responses to redirect the querier into a walled > garden or enclave that is NOT part of the open Internet. Adoption and > acceptance of this draft is an acknowledgement that the IETF, the IAB > and ISOC reject the principles espoused > at https://open-stand.org/about-us/principles/ > <https://open-stand.org/about-us/principles/>, in particular article 3. > Collective Empowerment insofar as the evolution of the DNS is concerned.
Very strong -1 against that text, here! RPZ is already in very widespread use on the open Internet, especially as a means to protect end users against botnet C&C hosts. Ray ob. disclaimer - I work for a DNS vendor that implements RPZ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
