On 13/03/2017 05:35, william manning wrote:
> Joel,
> 
> I'd be happy to see the document proceed under two conditions:  1) it
> becomes a WG document, subject to IETF change control, and 2) that the
> disclaimer requested back on 20170103 be added to the document. To
> refresh the collective mind, here is the missing text:
> 
> applicability statement.
> 
> This draft is documents a process and method for intercepting DNS
> queries and fabricating responses to redirect the querier into a walled
> garden or enclave that is NOT part of the open Internet. Adoption and
> acceptance of this draft is an acknowledgement that the IETF, the IAB
> and ISOC reject the principles espoused
> at https://open-stand.org/about-us/principles/
> <https://open-stand.org/about-us/principles/>, in particular article 3. 
> Collective Empowerment insofar as the evolution of the DNS is concerned.

Very strong -1 against that text, here!

RPZ is already in very widespread use on the open Internet, especially
as a means to protect end users against botnet C&C hosts.

Ray

ob. disclaimer - I work for a DNS vendor that implements RPZ


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to