> On Mar 9, 2017, at 18:31, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > The protocol described in draft-vcelak-nsec5 has improved since it was first > presented, but it is still unclear why we should adopt it as part of DNSSEC. > The benefits listed in the draft are real, but they come at a very steep cost > for zone administrators who might use NSEC5. > > Is there a community of zone admins who want this so much that they won't > start signing until it exists?
> If not, adopting this seems like a bad idea. I agree with this summary. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
