Hi,

The secretariat has graciously given us access to a webex login for the WG, so 
the setup details for the virtual interim tomorrow are:

        Meeting number: 644 850 881
        Meeting password: special

        Meeting link: 
https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m420b562577eec300c73de2e3c9b7d49f

         Audio connection:

         1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll free number (US/Canada)

         1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada)

         Access code: 644 850 881

Agenda:

0. Intro/note well/agenda bash (chairs)

1. Issues from WGLC on the problem statement 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps) (authors)

2. Update on alt-tld 
((https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/) (authors)

3. Proposals for moving forward:

* alt-tld to WGLC?

* stop here? (leave RFC 6761 as-is, continue to process registry changes 
case-by-case)

* proposals for process revision/update?

* any drafts to write?

* any input or liaison that DNSOP should request from the IAB? (regarding 
either namespace architecture or relationships of the IETF with other groups)

4. AOB: your I-D or proposed action for the WG/IESG/IAB here

> On Feb 2, 2017, at 4:48 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> And because it’s been that day….
> 
> Thanks for the off-list nudge, that’s ***Thursday 16 February*** for most of 
> the world, Friday 17 February for the AP region.
> 
> We’ve blocked two hours for the meeting.
> 
> Apologies for the error.
> 
> 
> Suzanne
> 
> 
>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:suzworldw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 3. We still want (and have time) to do a virtual interim WG meeting before 
>> Chicago. We’ve picked a date:
>> 
>> Thursday 17 February, 19:00 UTC, which is:
>> 
>> 19:00 UTC
>> 20:00 CEST (Frankfurt, Stockholm)
>> 14:00 EST (North American Eastern)
>> 11:00 PST (North American Western)
>> 06:00 AEDT (Sydney, Melbourne)
>> 
>> (Webex details will follow)
>> 
>> As usual, scheduling isn’t perfect for anyone but we tried to cover the 
>> largest possible area of the globe adequately.
>> 
>> Preliminary agenda for the meeting is:
>> 
>>      1. Issues from WGLC on the problem statement 
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/>)
>>      2. Proposals for moving forward:
>>              * reviews of alt-tld; ready for WGLC? will it help? 
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/>)
>>              * stop here? (leave RFC 6761 as-is, continue to process 
>> registry changes case-by-case)
>>              * proposals for process revision/update?
>>      3. Next steps: 
>>              * any drafts to write?
>>              * any input or liaison to request from the IAB? (regarding 
>> either namespace architecture or relationships of the IETF with other groups)
>>      4. AOB: your I-D or proposed action for the WG/IESG/IAB here
>> 
>> 
>> thanks,
>> Suzanne & Tim
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to