On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:11:01PM -0000,
 John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote 
 a message of 16 lines which said:

> Considering the vastly different ways that software handles .local
> and .onion and example.com and 10.in-addr.arpa, and that next thing
> to come along (.homenet?) will likely be different from any of the
> existing ones, this strikes me as akin to asking for a pony.

Some people in the discussion wanted ICANN to do something. This is
akin to asking for an unicorn (at least, ponies do exist).

> If you just want a list of the names so your recursive resolver can
> stub them out, we already have that, of course.

URL, please, with the expected behavior of the resolver when queried
for the domain.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to