> On Feb 4, 2017, at 4:46 AM, Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> wrote: > > > > On 04/02/2017 02:13, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >> Right, that's always been the problem with using this _for the DNS_. >> Homenet has no choice in that, because the whole point of the homenet >> name is precisely to enable in-homenet DNS without reference to the >> global DNS. I think you're quite correct that we need to decide >> whether alt is to be used for those purposes. I'm not convinced >> that's so useful. > > If it turns out that we can't get the insecure delegation that we need > for .homenet, then I'd (personally) be reasonably happy with > .homenet.alt, except that the current proposals for the use of .alt > wouldn't seem to permit that. > > Ray
What is wrong with homenet.arpa ? you can have that next month and no-one will complain Olafur _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
