Just to play the devil's advocate here, what does this have to do with DNS?
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote: > > > On 17 November 2016 at 12:00, Dan York <y...@isoc.org> wrote: >> >> DNSOP, >> >> In SUNSET4 right now, Emily Stark from Google presented a draft from Mike >> West (also Google) asking to update the language in RFC 6761 around the >> resolution of localhost: >> >> Draft: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost-02 >> >> Slides: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost-02.txt >> >> It was brought to SUNSET4 because they are interested in stopping the >> proliferation of IPv4 addresses. > > > This sounds like something we should consider adopting in DNSOP. > >> >> >> Dan >> >> -- >> Dan York >> Senior Content Strategist, Internet Society >> y...@isoc.org +1-802-735-1624 >> Jabber: y...@jabber.isoc.org >> Skype: danyork http://twitter.com/danyork >> >> http://www.internetsociety.org/ >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
