Carrot and stick. The current IESG can certainly abstain new proposals to death, and individual ADs can refuse to publish. But in doing so they are trying to lead the consensus on a new direction. They cannot unilaterally change it.
On Sep 29, 2016 10:27, "Paul Wouters" <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:21, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > > > > To be clear, while the IESG may have said something about their > > willingness to entertain further uses of the 6761 process, the 6761 > > process represents current IETF consensus. If we don't update it, it > > stands. > > That does contract earlier statements from dnsop that stated no new 6761 > based special names would be considered until we had a new solution. > > Paul >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
