On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:21, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > > To be clear, while the IESG may have said something about their > willingness to entertain further uses of the 6761 process, the 6761 > process represents current IETF consensus. If we don't update it, it > stands.
That does contract earlier statements from dnsop that stated no new 6761 based special names would be considered until we had a new solution. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
