On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 03:46:16PM -0700, Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote a message of 137 lines which said:
> My rationale is that if foo.bar.example.org were still a valid name By "valid name", do you mean "something which existed less than $TTL seconds ago"? > at the time that the bar.example.org NXDOMAIN response was issued, > then NXDOMAIN was not the correct response. It would be > inappropriate to answer for foo.bar.example.org out of the cache in > that case. The DNS is full of these (minor) inconsistencies. As Mark Andrews said, temporal issues are not new. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
