What is out of scope of the problem statement is saying what to do about them. :)
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:32 AM, David Cake <d...@davecake.net> wrote: > I tend to think that they may be within scope for the problem statement, > but it is likely that existing solutions (e.g. ICANN refusing to delegate > them while they remain toxic) are adequate to deal with the problem. > > David > > > On 19 Sep 2016, at 8:47 AM, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > > > >> Dealing with toxic waste names is out of scope for the problem > statement. > > > > Well, that's one theory. Let's see of other people agree. > > > > R's, > > John > > > > Regards, > > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. > https://jl.ly > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
