On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:51:08PM -0700, Ben Campbell <b...@nostrum.com> wrote a message of 25 lines which said:
> One minor question: In section 2, paragraph 3, which behavior is > "this behavior"? The continuing to use cached data under the cut, or > the cached non-existence itself? Cached non-existence. It was clear before but the later addition of paragraph 2 made it ambiguous. Thanks for noticing. I suggest to replace paragraph 3 with: Another exception is that a validating resolver MAY decide to implement the "NXDOMAIN cut" behaviour (described in the first paragraph of this section) only when the NXDOMAIN response has been validated with DNSSEC. See Section 8 for the rationale. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
