On 3 Sep 2016, at 20:20, Robert Edmonds wrote:
In section 3:
A paired DNS query and response is represented as an object. Two
optional members of this object are names "queryRecord" and
"responseRecord", and each has a value that is an message object.
This design was chosen (as compared to the more obvious array of
two
values) so that a paired DNS query and response could be
differentiated from a stream of DNS messages whose length happens
to
be two.
Why do you call these fields "queryRecord" and "responseRecord"? It
seems
to me that "queryMessage" and "responseMessage" would be more
intuitive.
Good call, yes. Will fix.
In section 7:
This document has no effect on IANA registries.
Do you plan to register a media type for this format? There is some
precedent: the "application/dns" media type was registered for the
experimental format defined in RFC 2540 "Detached Domain Name System
(DNS) Information".
<sigh> I guess I should. Prediction: things will rathole on this
section, not on the meat of the document.
Nit: "Questing section" → "Question section"
Fixed.
Thanks!
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
