On Apr 24, 2016, at 7:54 AM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > Paul. I think actually that we need to start maintaining a list of things > that ought to be explicitly looked for when reviewing documents for > publication, and this sort of thing would be one such.
I'll admit some surprise that such a list doesn't already exist. > This is not to say that it's not a hard problem, though--such a list could > easily become unwieldy. We tried to do something like that with RFC 7227 > section 13. The problem is that if there isn't a single resource to go to > for this stuff, and there's no step in the review process where this sort of > check happens. That's also surprising. The fact that problems like this haven't occurred before honestly increases my (already high) opinion of working group chairs and the IESG. Regards, -drc (speaking only for myself)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
