On 24 Apr 2016, at 16:20, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 23 Apr 2016, at 19:58, Ted Lemon wrote: > >> Bottom line: this is not actually the intended way things should work for >> naming in homenets, and a lot of people missed it. Sigh. > > ...for well over a year. You see that exact phrase in the draft over many > revisions. This is a sign that maybe the 6761 problem is going to be harder > than some people think.
Now it is at least possible to point to 6761, which I think is a step forward -- EVEN IF people think 6761 must be replaced, updated and what not. ;-) Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
