Read it, like it, and >3.1 ... The parent retrieves the CDS and inserts the corresponding DS RRset as >requested,
I think the parent can accept the CDS and insert the DS RRset as requested or as per Parent policy. Meaning the Parent could take the signed child DNSKEY and create DS RRset based on parent policy and not being forced to accept the CDS algorithm & Digest type. > -----Original Message----- > From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Wicinski > Sent: April-03-16 5:29 PM > To: dnsop > Subject: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds/ > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone feels > the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with your > reasons. > > Feel free to show up at DNSOP's Wednesday session and voice your approval > or disapproval. > > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on > 17 April 2016 > > thanks > tim > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
