On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:44:44AM +0000,
Adrien de Croy <adr...@qbik.com> wrote
a message of 217 lines which said:
> .example
> and
>
> example.com
> example.net
> example.org
>
> It's clear that the reservation of the second level domains is not
> behaving as we intend with 6761, since I can do a resolution of
> these names with DNS, and connect to the servers with HTTP.
You should read RFC 6761. Its section 6.5 is clear: "Name resolution
APIs and libraries SHOULD NOT recognize example names as special and
SHOULD NOT treat them differently. Name resolution APIs SHOULD send
queries for example names to their configured caching DNS
server(s). Caching DNS servers SHOULD NOT recognize example names as
special and SHOULD resolve them normally."
So, they behave exactly as mandated.
That's, by the way, why section 2 of draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00 is
written as it is ("if and only if", so excluding .example).
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
