------ Original Message ------
From: "Philip Homburg" <pch-dn...@u-1.phicoh.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Sent: 7/04/2016 3:05:26 a.m.
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft

In your letter dated Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:21:31 -0300 you wrote:
Strong dissensus here. The problem is there is no safe way to have AND
 KEEP such a name.

Also, it would make very difficult to DNS programmers to keep track of
all these "special but not special" domain names.

Personally, I consider naming systems developed outside the IETF a problem.

There should be no register, because they should not exist.
+1


So any hint that there is a process for non-IETF naming systems should
be removed.

Naming at the root of the name space should develop very slowly. Slow
enough that everybody (local name resolution, but also security mechanisms)
can adapt.

These systems should be considered carefully for all implications before they
are deployed. And not just pop up.
I agree.

DNS namespace has worked basically unchanged for decades.

It's battle-hardened.

Now we decide that the DNS namespace is the one and only namespace and that we want other resolution protocols so therefore the DNS namespace has to be perverted.

And when I see arguments like the IETF should assign root names so that organisations who can't afford lawyers can retain perpetual rights over a branch of the namespace I have to shake my head.

At the very least can we not segment this off into a single root?

E.g.

have a separate registry for other protocols which all fit under .notdns

I think the security implications of a resolver checking some internet source for a machine readable list of the latest special use names have not even been considered, and I think it has the potential for some serious problems. What problem(s) are we trying to solve, and what problems are we creating by trying to solve it.

Adrien



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to