> From: Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org> >> Last week, Kato and I submitted -03 version of >> draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse draft. It improved the >> structure of the document for readability and made minor corrections >> but essential idea has not been changed. > > Thank you for this work. I hope that it goes forward. > > The latest draft seems to have spent a lot of time covering NSEC3 more > clearly.
Thanks, > My main question is... are there any missing pieces that you know of? It > seems pretty complete to me, although I have not implemented it so I > can't really say. (Implementation of NSEC3 aggressive negative caching is missing.) (I would like to implement NSEC3 version) > If there are not missing pieces, are there controversial parts? There are some controversial parts. - Aggressive negative caching itself - The CD bit If these parts will be agreed, I would like to go ahead. Regards, -- Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
