In message <a1dd7fb4-3847-4e4f-a5d2-94e914492...@gmail.com>, Suzanne Woolf writ es: > The no-response draft has a similar issue IMO, in that it's quite > prescriptive about what a certain set of players (TLD operators) should > do about identified problems, and silent on advice to anyone else > (registrars who have customer relationships with domain owners, DNS > hosting operators, DNS implementers,... > .)
We could just add this: + <t> + Nothing in this section precludes others testing servers + for protocol compliance. DNS operators should test their + servers to ensure that their vendors have shipped protocol + compliant products. Nameserver vendors can use these tests + as a part of this release processes. Registrants can use + these tests to check their DNS operators servers. + </t> -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
