>> I think it would fall under REGEXT once it's up? The REGEXT charter >> has a section about DNS Operator. >> >>> The working group will also identify the requirements for a >>> registration protocol where a third-party DNS provider is involved. >>> These requirements will be documented in an Informational RFC. > > based on on current progress I would expect regext to exist prior to or > by IETF 92.
And by "IETF 92", Joel means IETF 95. Barry _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
