Hi, I think it would fall under REGEXT once it's up? The REGEXT charter has a section about DNS Operator.
> The working group will also identify the requirements for a > registration protocol where a third-party DNS provider is involved. > These requirements will be documented in an Informational RFC. Jack > -----Original Message----- > From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Levine > Sent: February-13-16 4:45 PM > To: dnsop@ietf.org > Subject: [DNSOP] Any interest in draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol ? > > I noticed the -02 of this draft go by yesterday. > > It's a very rough version of a DNSSEC key record bootstrap design in which the > operator of the delegated zone pokes the operator of the upper level zone > using http, which tells the upper level zone to import keys from the delegated > zone's CDS and CDNSKEY records. > > Is there much interest in this? > > On my tiny DNS server I have over 100 signed zones where I can't install the > upper level DS records because I'm not the registrant, I'm just running their > DNS. It would be nice to have a way to do that that scales better than > walking each of the registrants through their registrars' DNSSEC update > processes. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
