I think the dicussion of names is useful and insightful. we can find a home for it I'm pretty sure but I'm happy to see discussion of it.
joel On 11/3/15 4:39 PM, Tim WIcinski wrote: > > I spoke to Ed this morning during breakfast, and we discussed his > draft. I do like this as a well written read through the history of > namespace and domains, but I feel (and I think Ed even would agree) this > is not so much a DNSOP document, but something that should be in an area > where they need a better understanding of DNS (*cough* appsawg *cough*). > > How does the working group think of this? > > thanks > tim > > On 10/30/15 8:23 PM, Edward Lewis wrote: >> A while back I floated a draft across this mail list and got (what I >> think) is sufficient (perhaps not the right word) feedback from the WG. I >> updated the document and resubmitted. FWIW, this is the document link: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-domain-names-01 >> >> I'm not even asking for comment on the list (but you can if you want). >> When I rev'd the document, I didn't mention it on this list (until now). >> >> What I'm asking for is - when in Yokohama, if you have an interest in this >> I'm willing to discuss. >> >> The issue in the document is both internal to DNS and external to DNS, I'm >> looking for broader input (such as applications area topics). >> >> Ed >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
