On Friday, October 30, 2015 01:52:18 AM yaojk wrote:

> > in order to utilize expensive high
> > bandwith discussion time 
> > 
> 
> 
> I agree with you about this point. We should not waste the high bandwith
> discussion time.We should fully utilize the expensive f2f discusstion
> time.

yao, your draft has failed to garner sufficient interest to warrant discussion 
time, even when compared to "any other business" (matters brought to the floor 
in real time.) my own view, as i've already told you privately, is that no 
possible change to your draft will make it seem useful to the dnsop wg.

i think if you want to discuss some other idea, for example, persistent 
coherent metadata caching, to see if there's interest in our problem 
statement, and comments on our proposed approach, then the wg chairs would 
certainly make expensive f2f time available.

-- 
P Vixie

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to