Hello, AD here. On 10/28/15 5:24 AM, yaojk wrote: > > > > >> 在 2015年10月28日，19:45，Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> 写道： >> >> >> >> >>> On 10/28/15 7:37 AM, yaojk wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/agenda?item=agenda-94-dnsop.html >>> >>> From the agenda above, I see that it doesn't include my draft >>> discussion. Could you kindly assignee 5 minutes to introduce the draft- >>> yao-dnsop-root-cache？ >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jiankang Yao >> >> Hi >> >> Thanks for asking, but we're not going to give time to this draft. > > > > It might be your power as chairman. But I think that your arguments to block > the draft discussion is not reasonable.
We invest chairs with editorial discretion among other things. that is of course backstopped with an appeals process but for now somebody has to manage the facility. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2418#section-6.1 >> The consensus of comments about the draft is that it has many issues that >> need to be addressed. > > > Unfortunately, I haven't such senses of your called consensus. I'm not going to challenge that assertion... For myself; Joe Abley's message on 9/30 is the last cogent message related to the discussion of this draft that's on record. to date (until now) I don't see further activity on it. > On 9/30/15 6:17 AM, Joe Abley wrote: ... > I think I would need to see a convincing problem statement and > understand how this proposal provided effective solutions before I > could support it. There doesn't really seem to be much point (imho) in taking the discussion off the mailing list in order to utilize expensive high bandwith discussion time since it just trailed off a month ago, that said, that's not up to me. thanks joel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
