>> >>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:39:33AM -0400, >>> Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>> Can you clarify what was the resolution for the problem of matching >>> replies to questions? I believe that most people (like me) are happy >>> with the ID+QNAME+QCLASS+transport_tuple of >>> <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YCkm0bc3c0XjnU71kyGU8V8SGZg> >>> but it seems we may have at least a dissent >>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/egQ4zEMacf_JmohgNNguOBXjVJA> >> >> Sara's proposal does seem to take into account Mark's concern, since >> she specified using the QNAME/QCLASS/QTYPE only if they are present in >> the reply.
Yes, my response above was posted after Marks comment and adjusted the proposed text to take his point into account. There were 2 indications of support for the new text and no other comments so I hope this has correctly addressed the concern. Sara. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
