On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:39:33AM -0400, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote a message of 36 lines which said:
> The WGLC ended on this, and there was strong consensus to move this > document forward. Can you clarify what was the resolution for the problem of matching replies to questions? I believe that most people (like me) are happy with the ID+QNAME+QCLASS+transport_tuple of <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YCkm0bc3c0XjnU71kyGU8V8SGZg> but it seems we may have at least a dissent <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/egQ4zEMacf_JmohgNNguOBXjVJA> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
