On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Joe Abley wrote:
In a fit of zeal I wrote up what I thought was a reasonable clarification to 1034/1035 with respect to the ordering of RRSets within sections of a response to a DNS QUERY, prompted by the discussions on this list in August, to which maybe this link is a useful pointer:
Mark and Paul gave me some opinions as I was writing this up, that I may or may not have represented accurately in the text. I think the advice is reasonable, but thoughts from the throng as to (a) whether this was worth writing down and (b) whether what I wrote is nonsense would be appreciated.
I find it strange that you suggest ordering matters for the Answer section but not the Authoritative section. It seems that we will just get more assumptions from code that order matters there too, and 10 years from now we are writting this document again, but for the Authoritative section. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
