Hi all,
In a fit of zeal I wrote up what I thought was a reasonable
clarification to 1034/1035 with respect to the ordering of RRSets within
sections of a response to a DNS QUERY, prompted by the discussions on
this list in August, to which maybe this link is a useful pointer:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7KoE8Dr-SxuNToskxbvAwJ3BQLQ
Mark and Paul gave me some opinions as I was writing this up, that I may
or may not have represented accurately in the text. I think the advice
is reasonable, but thoughts from the throng as to (a) whether this was
worth writing down and (b) whether what I wrote is nonsense would be
appreciated.
Joe
Forwarded message:
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
To: Joe Abley <jab...@dyn.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers-00.txt
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 05:39:13 -0700
A new version of I-D, draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Joe Abley and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers
Revision: 00
Title: Ordering of RRSets in DNS Messages
Document date: 2015-10-09
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 12
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers-00
Abstract:
The existing Domain Name System (DNS) specifications lack some
clarity in their description of the process by which individual
sections of a DNS message are constructed.
This document updates RFC 1034 and RFC 1035 to provide a clearer
specification, consistent with deployed implementations.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
