Dear DNSOP / chairs, The same applies to the various P2P drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p- bit/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-gns/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-i2p/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-exit/ We would like the IETF to follow the same process it applied to .onion, especially given that the origin of these drafts pre-dates the .onion submission and they are equally technically justified, except of course that the urgency of the IAB .onion certification did not apply. Naturally, we're also happy to receive constructive comments, but maybe 2 years of energetic discussions will finally suffice? Thanks! Christian On 09/13/2015 10:15 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Dear DNSOP / chairs, > > We were requested to hold off on this document until the .onion > document had completed it's process. As this has now been approved, > and lies with the RFC Editor, we are requesting WGLC of > draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld ("The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain") > > W > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
