Hi Jari,

On 9/2/15 4:09 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: No Record
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The two last references need to be normative ones, I believe. I would
> like to suggest a note to the IETF list (if not already happened) that
> this is being changed (alongside with any down ref implications) and only
> then approving the document.
> 

*If* we make this change (I am not sure we need to), I don't think there
are any down ref implications.  The two Tor documents do not have any
track associated with them.

Brian


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to