Hi Benoit! Just to amplify a point that Hellekin has already made to the DNSOP list:
> If/Once [tor-rendezvous] is a normative reference, do we consider github > as stable enough? What if that link disappears? Mark Nottingham has an amended document - not submitted, but accruing amendments to address all the issues raised by IESG - at the following URL: http://mnot.github.io/I-D/dnsop-onion-tld/draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-01.txt <http://mnot.github.io/I-D/dnsop-onion-tld/draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-01.txt> …which he shared recently to this list, including a link to provide synoptic comparison of the existing draft and his amended copy. In this new document you will see that - per recommendation - the relevant notes are being moved to a new, s5.1 “Normative” section, and (for clarity) the references to “gitweb.torproject.org" have been rewritten to reference the Tor Project’s specification site URI, spec.torproject.org <http://spec.torproject.org/>. Any references to “gitweb.torproject.org” which you have seen in past (or currently) refer to a Tor Project internal Git repository, rather than the commercial Github company and its commercial offering. The git software is open-source and widely instantiated. :-) I hope this helps, and I shall be listening with interest to the call later today. Thanks! - alec — Alec Muffett Security Infrastructure Facebook Engineering London
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
