Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quoting Alvara, whose opinion I share: " [Personally, I believe having the IETF assign TLDs is a very slippery slope. Of course, given rfc6761, that boat seems to have already sailed.] Discussing this matter with Joel, one extra argument (not in the write-up) in favor of allocating .onion is that ICANN set this .onion TLD aside (flagged as problematic). So there is no monetized value for it. If/Once [tor-rendezvous] is a normative reference, do we consider github as stable enough? What if that link disappears? Nits/editorials (flagged by Tom Taylor's OPS directorate review) Section 2 item 3: s/either either/either/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
