On 08/10/2015 01:50 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: > > It does a fine job with .example since that's fundamentally > just a reservation, but .onion is showing its warts. >
Hi Ted, I fully agree with Alec, and do not understand how .onion would differ from .example in that case, especially since as we're speaking, onion names are fully compatible with DNS domain names, syntactically speaking. Can you elaborate on the difference you see, and why should we need to think forward to a non-existing set of future registries where onion names could end up at some point if at all? Regards, == hk _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
