> -----Original Message-----
> From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Donald Eastlake
> 
> Hi Ralf,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Ralf Weber <d...@fl1ger.de> wrote:
> > Moin!
> >
> 
> While the protocol is designed so that no state needs to be maintained at
the
> server, I don't think that sort of approach isn't explicitly prohibited.
But I think
> it would be more work for the server to remembers lots of server cookies
it
> has sent than to do simple calculation. Still, it is an implementation
choice.

I would refer you back to my example in my last message... "no state' is a
big word. I would be careful to use this word with such mechanism


Best,
Hosnieh


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to