Hi Donald, I think all the things you mentioned already addressed in other messages. So, I would only go to the part that is not already answered
> > It seems to me that presenting the defenses before the attacks means that > while you are reading the defenses they are un-motivated. I think the current > organization is better for a general technical audience. > Problem then solution, as in the current draft, just seems most logical to me. When one doesn't know still the mechanism and suddenly you start with attacks, it cannot judge to know whether the attack you're explaining is really applicable. Therefore, the person need to go to mechanism section. Of course, you can decide how to organize your draft. I am just saying that it was how it happened. Maybe good to mention in one paragraph what attacks it can prevent and move the detail about attacks after the explanation of the mechanism. Because with the current organization, one need to go to mechanism overview before reviewing attacks and only skim the attack to know how it wants to do this step... This was only a suggestion. Just do what you think it is relevant. Thanks, Best, Hosnieh _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
