Re: [DNSOP] what's in .alt, was Last Call: (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard

[Bob Bownes -Seiri]

On Jul 18, 2015, at 22:50, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:

> 
> For the most part, I expect that people will look in the registry (or 
> registries) to see what's already in use and pick names that don't collide, 
> since life is easier that way.  But if they do collide, I'd rather know the 
> bad news up front rather than depending on folklore to know which of the 
> names in the registry work and which ones collide with things you have to 
> find out about somewhere else.
> 
> In case it's not obvious, FCFS does require some minimal level of info so 
> people can find out more, but the harder we make it to register, the more 
> likely people are to distribute software and not tell us about it.

By this logic, using a FCFS 'registry' model implies at least enough 
information (if not a requirement) for some of tracking the registrant to 
confirm continued use, transfer, release or abandonment at the very least, no?
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop