Hugo, On Jul 17, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Hugo Maxwell Connery <h...@env.dtu.dk> wrote: > The goal here from the non-DNS people seems to be to have DNS type labels > (thus URI's) > which are known to the recursive and authoritative resolvers to be outside of > DNS.
That appears to be the goal of some folks, however the insertion of strings into the Special Names Registry will not (of course) by itself result in recursive and authoritative servers. > If it is known that .a to .z are such; why where they not used? Perhaps they > should be > publicized a little more. They aren't -- my suggestion was to avoid bikeshed painting on the specific string to use for the "not DNS" TLD. > Additionally, we a challenge with the certificate issuance for .onion, For clarity, I was speaking of the string being used in Warren's ALT draft. I've already indicated support for ONION in the Special Names Registry for pragmatic reasons. Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
