David Conrad wants metrics for Tor. Unsurprisingly, they have them. Our evil spam filter is stopping me from sending a link, but go to:
https metrics torproject org There you find: number of relays and bridges, advertised bandwidth, and connected users, as graphs over time, and much more. As of now approx 10 000 relays + bridges with 200 000 connected users. /Hugo ________________________________________ From: DNSOP [dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of David Conrad [d...@virtualized.org] Sent: Wednesday, 15 July 2015 04:37 To: Stephane Bortzmeyer Cc: dnsop; IETF Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard [snip] I try to be pragmatic. Given I do not believe that refusing to put ONION in the special names registry will stop the use of .ONION, the size of the installed base of TOR implementations, and the implications of the use of that string in certificates, I supporting moving ONION to the special names registry. I really (really) wish there was more concrete, objective metrics (e.g., size of installed base or some such), but my gut feeling is that TOR is pretty well deployed and given the CAB Forum stuff, I see no particular reason to delay (after all, it's not like the deployed base of TOR is likely to get smaller). Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
