Bill, On Jul 10, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson <o...@ogud.com> wrote:
> Question: > What sections of 2181 do you see the need to update? This seems to be the critical question to your chairs and our AD as well. If I understand it correctly, your proposed document roadmap has us putting eight documents through the process as standards-track RFCs with no change in substance from RFC 2181, so we can then put three more documents through the process with new content. This seems like a very process-heavy way to update 2181. It's also hard to commit to obsoleting 2181 in eight separate steps without seeing the proposed updated content will be, or knowing whether it will get to consensus. Could you describe the substance of what you think needs to be changed? If the WG wants to do the work, we can manage the process machinery accordingly. thanks, Suzanne _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
